We estimate the dynamics of political preferences over social insurance and redistribution when people receive new information about their individual economic situation and prospects in the form of unanticipated shocks to two key determinants of individual welfare: employment and income. While it is broadly accepted that expectations about social mobility in the long-run affect current political preferences, much less is known about the consequences for political preferences of a key dynamic of economic life: when realized outcomes do not match prior expectations at the individual level. We elicit and validate subjective probabilistic expectations over future employment and incomes in the short term and construct measures of anticipated and unanticipated shocks comparing expectations with realized outcomes, measured from third party administrative data, in a large Danish panel. Our main result, based on fixed effects specifications allowing for interpersonal differences in expectations formation and ability, is that unanticipated economic shocks affect political preferences, while anticipated changes do not. In particular, unanticipated unemployment shocks increase support for unemployment benefits, while realizing expected unemployment has no effects. Unanticipated negative income shocks cause citizens to polarize in their views on redistribution depending on prior beliefs, while anticipated income changes have no effect.
Presented at: Arizona, EPSA 2017, APSA 2017, NBER Political Economy Fall 2017, Stanford, Copenhagen, Danish Public Choice Workshop 2017